Evidence-led legal matching

Find the right lawyer and the right next move

Three Crowns compares careers, firms and market outcomes to identify stronger matches for legal teams and for lawyers deciding what comes next.

Professionals in the City of London

Our market view

A broader evidence base changes the answer

We do not begin with a vacancy board or a contact list. We begin with a structured view of the relevant legal market.

98,000+

Lawyer profiles

Structured career histories used to understand progression, tenure, practice and movement.

47

Law firms mapped

Firm directories mapped across practices, offices, seniority and professional histories.

Current published dataset snapshot: 12 June 2026.

Two decisions, one evidence model

A clearer answer for both sides of the match

Clients need to know who is most likely to fit. Candidates need to know which role and organisation offer the strongest realistic next step.

For clients

A shortlist ranked by evidence, not familiarity

We assess hundreds of relevant lawyers, incorporate the client's hiring and retention patterns, and explain why one candidate ranks above another.

  • A market mapped beyond the recruiter's existing network
  • Candidates ranked against the mandate and client context
  • Compatibility, retention outlook and uncertainty made visible
See the client example

For candidates

A private report on your realistic next moves

We compare your career evidence with firms, companies and observed career paths, then identify the roles and organisations that best fit what you want to build.

  • A career profile compared with relevant firms and companies
  • Realistic roles, levels and named employers in a private report
  • The evidence for each match, its trade-offs and questions to test
Request your career report

How matching works

From a complex market to an explained recommendation

Data widens the search and exposes patterns. Probabilistic modelling handles incomplete evidence. Recruiter judgement turns the result into a decision someone can challenge and understand.

01

Define the decision

We begin with the hiring mandate or the career outcome a lawyer wants to achieve.

02

Map the relevant market

We look across lawyer histories, firms, teams, movement patterns and verified professional evidence.

03

Estimate and rank fit

The model compares realistic options and updates its assessment as supporting or conflicting evidence is added.

04

Explain the recommendation

A recruiter reviews the result and makes the reasons, trade-offs, uncertainty and next questions clear.

Explore our intelligence

Our specialisms

Matching across the legal career

The evidence changes by career stage and mandate, but the question remains the same: where is this person most likely to do their best work?

Probabilistic, not absolute

Better informed does not mean falsely certain

No model can guarantee that a lawyer will succeed or remain at a firm. Ours estimates compatibility and retention risk, shows uncertainty and updates as evidence changes.

Recruiter judgement remains part of every recommendation. The model supports a decision; it does not make one in secret.

Read our methodology